On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 00:07 +0100, Branko Cibej wrote:
> This will sound like yet another rant: whatever happened to our policy
> of keeping the code free of warnings? I'm referring specifically to the
> large number of deprecation warnings that come from almost every
> function in svn_path.h being deprecated.
>
> I'm all for replacing those functions with the uri, dirent and relpath
> variants. However, there's no excuse for deprecating everything, then
> leaving the warnings in. Sure it's tedious and boring work to fix the
> warnings ... and I wouldn't worry if there were only a few of them. But
> the current situations is intolerable because it makes maintainer-mode
> much less useful than it should be.
Yes. I currently add -Wno-deprecated-declarations to CFLAGS and ignore
the issue. (Also -Wno-unreachable-code -Wno-format-nonliteral.)
But it would be good to sort it out. I have started analyzing/reviewing
the path functions.
- Julian
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2413785
Received on 2009-11-02 14:55:41 CET