Re: more editor v2

David Glasser wrote:
> One thing that you haven't mentioned explicitly that I think does help
> me understand this, if I'm correct: this "set_text" call does take a
> "revision" argument, which I assume (it's undocumented) is a revision
> of the file which presumably both sides of the connection have the
> fulltext of. The inclusion of this argument should allow the RA layer
> to turn this into a delta when necessary without having to be
> completely clairvoyant as to what the context it is being called in.
>
> --dave

Well, yep, this whole set_text() question was going to lead up to "what is
the REVISION arg doing there?", but I didn't get to that part yet ;)

~Neels

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2395766