Yup. See attached.
Julian Foad wrote:
> Have you got a repro script you could send?
>
> - Julian
>
>
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 14:45 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> I was attempting to test a theory today. The theory goes like this: when
>> committed the deleted of a locked file over HTTP, if the commit fails and
>> --no-unlock was *not* specified, the lock will be dropped by the server but
>> the client won't know it until it next updates. I think I proved that to be
>> true, but I ran into a tree conflict along the way. I setup my test,
>> eventually resulting in my having a working copy with a deleted, locked
>> file. I add a pre-commit hook to my repository that fails all commits. I
>> try to commit from my working copy, and (surprise!) the commit fails. But
>> then I tried to update that working copy, and got a tree conflict. What?
>>
>> $ svn st lock-wc
>> D KC lock-wc/foo
>> > local delete, incoming edit upon update
>> $
>>
>> The traced update looks like so:
>>
>> <S:update-report xmlns:S="svn:"
>> xmlns:V="http://subversion.tigris.org/xmlns/dav/" xmlns:D="DAV:"
>> send-all="true">
>> <S:target-revision rev="1"/>
>> <S:open-directory rev="1">
>> <D:checked-in><D:href>/tests/lock-repos/!svn/ver/1/</D:href></D:checked-in>
>> <S:set-prop name="svn:entry:committed-rev">1</S:set-prop>
>> <S:set-prop
>> name="svn:entry:committed-date">2009-09-14T18:27:25.596545Z</S:set-prop>
>> <S:remove-prop name="svn:entry:last-author"/>
>> <S:set-prop
>> name="svn:entry:uuid">2d4da764-a15c-11de-b414-7f3668e1b5e6</S:set-prop>
>> <S:open-file name="foo" rev="1">
>> <D:checked-in><D:href>/tests/lock-repos/!svn/ver/1/foo</D:href></D:checked-in>
>> <S:set-prop name="svn:entry:committed-rev">1</S:set-prop>
>> <S:set-prop
>> name="svn:entry:committed-date">2009-09-14T18:27:25.596545Z</S:set-prop>
>> <S:remove-prop name="svn:entry:last-author"/>
>> <S:set-prop
>> name="svn:entry:uuid">2d4da764-a15c-11de-b414-7f3668e1b5e6</S:set-prop>
>> <S:remove-prop name="svn:entry:lock-token"/>
>> <S:prop><V:md5-checksum>d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e</V:md5-checksum></S:prop>
>> </S:open-file>
>> <S:prop></S:prop>
>> </S:open-directory>
>> </S:update-report>
>>
>> I have a pair of questions.
>>
>> 1. Is the tree conflicts code balking at the removal of the lock token as
>> an edit to the file scheduled for deletion?
>>
>> 2. Why is the server also trying to remove the last-committed-author?
>
>
>
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2395070
Received on 2009-09-15 14:53:22 CEST