On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:08 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> I remember we made an agenda last year and discussed things on it,
>>> and
>>> that took up more than all of the first day. Then we broke
>>> informally
>>> into smaller discussion groups afterwards. It felt frantic: so
>>> much to
>>> do, so little time. It was good.
>>
>> Yes. The more time we get, the better. +1 for having a room
>> throughout
>> the entire event, if that's possible.
>
> That's my feeling, too.
Having the room for all three days last year was quite useful. My
only concern is that I don't want to take advantage of their
generosity: I plan on doing a fair amount of hacking during SubConf,
but I also know that I'll be in-and-out for at least part of those
three days. The fact that others will be there means we'll probably
have several people using the room at any given point, so I'd go with
all three days.
As for Dave Brown, I also know him. He's actually submitted a few
JavaHL patches over the last month or so. I think our meeting should
be open to any developer (committer or not) who wants to come. Such
participation, if only in a passive way, is useful for increasing our
developer pool, which is never a bad thing. (These individuals would
of course need to cover the 100€/day fee required by the organizers.)
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2388362
Received on 2009-08-28 21:45:23 CEST