On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:39:03AM +0200, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Stsp,
>
> so you're not able to reproduce this error anymore, apparently. Can this
> comment be removed again? (see below)
>
Yes, we can remove it.
Stefan
> ~Neels
>
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Wed Aug 19 07:43:12 2009
> > New Revision: 38848
> >
> > Log:
> > * subversion/libsvn_client/repos_diff.c
> > (add_directory): Add a temporary comment regarding a failing merge test.
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/repos_diff.c
> >
> > Modified: trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/repos_diff.c
> > URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/repos_diff.c?pathrev=38848&r1=38847&r2=38848
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/repos_diff.c Wed Aug 19 06:43:21 2009 (r38847)
> > +++ trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/repos_diff.c Wed Aug 19 07:43:12 2009 (r38848)
> > @@ -936,6 +936,13 @@ add_directory(const char *path,
> > this is a tree-conflict case. The path is already marked tree-
> > conflicted (either by some previous run altogether, or by this
> > replace's delete operation). No need to notify again here. */
> > + /* ### Failing test merge_test 132:
> > + * ### There is nothing that guarantees that the delete will come
> > + * ### before the add. If you trace the merge done in merge_test 132
> > + * ### and break at subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c:merge_file_added
> > + * ### and subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c:merge_file_deleted, you
> > + * ### can see that the add gets called first, then the delete (for
> > + * ### the file "mu"). */
> > svn_wc_notify_t *notify;
> > svn_boolean_t is_replace = FALSE;
> > deleted_path_notify_t *dpn = apr_hash_get(eb->deleted_paths, b->wcpath,
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=2385252
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2386514
Received on 2009-08-23 16:51:46 CEST