[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: no-op-copy -- was: Re: Defining atomic "replace"

From: Neels Janosch Hofmeyr <neels_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:51:06 +0200

Julian Foad wrote:
> At the moment I don't mind that it works this way. Not sure what you
> mean by "worth testing for".

Yes, that's exactly what I meant ;)
"it's not worth the trouble to test for this case and change this behavior
at the moment".

~Neels

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2383092

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on 2009-08-13 02:53:33 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "Re: tree conflicts with replace"
Previous message: Neels Janosch Hofmeyr: "Re: tree conflicts with replace"
In reply to: Julian Foad: "Re: no-op-copy -- was: Re: Defining atomic "replace""

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.