Re: Remove entries cache in adm_access

"Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> writes:

> As for API consumers which are using entries and now have sub-optimal
> memory consumption, I say "tough rocks, upgrade to the new APIs".
> That might be harsh, but I think it's the reality as keeping the cache
> in sync is much more trouble than it's worth.

How bad is "sub-optimal"? If it's anything like the pre-1.0 clients
before entries caching then it's not just sub-optimal is unusable on
large working copies. I don't think "upgrade to the new APIs" is
compatible with our versioning goals. Our stated policy
http://subversion.tigris.org/hacking.html#release-numbering
has always been that old APIs will continue to work. If you want
to write 2.0 you don't get to call it 1.7.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2377412
Received on 2009-07-31 16:28:43 CEST