2009/7/28 Purple Streak <mrpurplestreak_at_googlemail.com>:
> [forgot to include list]
>
> 2009/7/28 Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>:
>> You misunderstand me. As you say, it is good to make the use of the
>> escape mechanism optional, for that reason. I meant the choice of WHICH
>> character to use seems unnecessary.
>
>
> Ok - sorry :)
> Like I said we use windows so the usual '\' char might well be
> confusing. How about the character argument becomes optional and
> defaults to '\' if not given?
>
>
> 2009/7/28 Geoff Rowell <geoff.rowell_at_gmail.com>:
>> I wouldn't suggest using a short option of "-c". It'll be confused with the
>> "change" identifier option.
>
> Very happy to make this whatever you suggest :) I just chose 'c' as
> short for "continuation_char". To be honest I wasnt't sure what to
> use for either of them but they seemed the most logical.
>
> Maybe "-o" ?
Hi - I'm keen to try and get this patch accepted so is what I
suggested about making the character optional acceptable ok?
Cheers,
Purple
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2377390
Received on 2009-07-31 15:33:40 CEST