Re: Proposal for sponsored development of "Obliterate"

On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 12:46 +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
> On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2009, Julian Foad wrote:
> > I now have a fairly detailed proposal for developing "Obliterate".
> > (Attached.)
> ...
> > Appreciating any advice,
> >
> > and review of the proposal itself.
>
>
> > Integration
> > If working on a branch, work shall be merged into trunk at least
> > at every defined milestone.
> I'm not so sure that merging to trunk would be possible/wise at your
> "singularly" defined points in time.
> At the least it might interfere with some other things.

Yes, that's a good point. What I meant was that the development must not
be allowed to remain isolated on a branch for a very long time.

> > Sponsor and contractor will respond to queries from the other
> > by end of next working day.
> Good luck with that.
> I don't think that the paying end wants to agree to this.
> (But maybe that's just my bad experience.)

Heh. Yes. Instead, I should say something less rigid and more
encouraging, such as, "The sponsor and the contractor should keep in
close contact throughout the project."

> The links at the end could be clickable.
>
>
> There's not much news in there, is it?

Thanks for the review.

- Julian

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2376043
Received on 2009-07-27 18:15:38 CEST