RE: Re: RFC: Reverting the semantic change made in r31101

To be honest the whole approach with depth and sparse directories looks bad-conceived as it jeopardizes the main functionality in the favor of subtle benefits (save a little on typing with code completion).

IMHO the whole related functionality shall be disabled in client by default (globally) and activated only by some configuration parameter.

And as for temp files that user do not want to add - there is an SVN ignore.

> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > Stefan Küng wrote:
> >> Patch looks good to me.
> >> +1 for committing this (and request for backporting to 1.6.x)
> >
> > Committed, and recommended for backport. (Does your mail count as a +1 in
> > STATUS on the backport, Stefan?)
> >
>
> Yes, but it seems it already has enough votes.
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2372022
Received on 2009-07-24 17:54:01 CEST