[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Issue 3436] New - Short option for --ignore-externals (-i ?)

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:31:46 -0700

Julian Foad wrote:
> Edmund Wong wrote:
>> Olivier FAURAX wrote:
>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3436
>>> Issue #|3436
>>> Summary|Short option for --ignore-externals (-i ?)
>>> Is it possible to add a short option for --ignore-externals, for
>> example -i or -I ?
>> Does anyone have any objections about this issue? If not, how about
>> objections about me taking this? If not, is there policy as to which
>> character to use? (My tendency is towards '-i'.)
> I would very much encourage you to take an issue such as this one, if
> it's a development that we want. And I see that this one looks like a
> good one to choose for an easy task.
> However, as I expect you are aware, an issue being in the issue tracker
> just means that someone, anyone, put it there; it doesn't mean there is
> any kind of consensus on it.
> We have always been very cautious of using up single-letter options,
> because there are not enough of them available for all the meanings we
> want. There are several options that we might want to abbreviate to '-i'
> or '-I':
> --no-ignores
> --non-interactive
> --ignore-externals
> --ignore-ancestry
> and we might well add more in 1.7, 1.8, 1.9.
> It could well be that --ignore-externals is the most commonly used by
> far, in which case we might want to add a short alias for it. But before
> we jump to any conclusions, we should also ask (the original poster, and
> ourselves) whether the problem would be better solved in a different
> way, perhaps by making "ignore-externals" a configurable option in
> ~/subversion/config and having an inverse option (--with-externals ?)
> available to override it if it only rarely needs to be overridden.
> Looking at the list of options we have, it seems to me that it would
> make sense for many of them to have a customisable default in the config
> file, and both positive and negative forms available on the command
> line.
> We also have a precedent of abbreviating a long option to a shorter
> "long" option: --changelist is also --cl. Maybe there's a good "long"
> abbreviation for --ignore-externals.
> Questions like this are one reason why an issue should have been
> discussed on the mailing list before it was filed.
> Do you have any involvement or perspective on this particular issue
> yourself?

Is --ignore-externals being used on the command line much or via scripting the
command line client?

I'm of the mind not to introduce a short option for --ignore-externals, not a
short one letter one.


Received on 2009-07-13 18:32:43 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.