Re: [RFC] Greatly improve merge performance, but break(?) edge cases

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:45:03 -0400

Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Paul, I don't think that taking the risk of merging incorrect changes
> into subtress, or not merging changes into them which should be merged,
> is a good answer to the performance problem...
> I think we should rather look into minimising network round trips and
> see how much that helps.

I agree. For obvious reasons, I'm sympathetic to the performance issues
that plague TruMerge's user base, but I can't endorse sacrificing
correctness for (mere) speed.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2369715

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on 2009-07-10 15:45:37 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Geoff Rowell: "RE: [RFC] *Greatly* improve merge performance, but break(?) edge cases"
Previous message: Stefan Sperling: "Re: [RFC] *Greatly* improve merge performance, but break(?) edge cases"
In reply to: Stefan Sperling: "Re: [RFC] *Greatly* improve merge performance, but break(?) edge cases"
Next in thread: Geoff Rowell: "RE: [RFC] *Greatly* improve merge performance, but break(?) edge cases"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Re: [RFC] *Greatly* improve merge performance, but break(?) edge cases

Re: [RFC] Greatly improve merge performance, but break(?) edge cases