[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: editor v2 and replace

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:12:37 +0200

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 18:44, Stefan Sperling<stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:29:13PM +0200, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Hmm. I figured that with the "add follows" flag, then you could know
>> to avoid dual-notifications, and just wait for the add. But yah...
>> then you'd need to remember (at add time) that a delete had happened.
>> More cross-call state.
>> Adding a flag to the add calls should work. Tho I hate the "replace"
>> terminology. Maybe "overwrite=TRUE" is better? (and, of course,
>> failure if you're trying to overwrite, and nothing is there)
>> Bikeshed. But yah. Extending the add calls sounds better. Thanks!
> I'd like to point that I'd also like an atomic editor
> call for move(), please!
> Can we do that?

RTF<Include File>

Received on 2009-06-11 19:13:00 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.