[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: false alarm -- was: Re: regression from 1.5.6

From: Neels Janosch Hofmeyr <neels_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:50:32 +0200

Bert, see mail on the users@ list:
Re: Weird need for "svn update"

Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Neels Janosch Hofmeyr [mailto:neels_at_elego.de]
>> Sent: woensdag 10 juni 2009 15:07
>> To: dev_at_subversion.tigris.org
>> Subject: false alarm -- was: Re: regression from 1.5.6
>> Sorry, false alarm, it seems like it's not a regression after all.
>> It's either a bug or a confusing use case...
>> I'm still checking it out, just wanting to note that this was a false
> alarm.
> You should look at what version the working copy and dir, dir/foo are. (svn
> info or the new entry dump tool used by the test framework will help you).
> At that last commit wc is probably still at the initial version where dir
> wasn't added, so dir can't be removed.
> Bert
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360941


Received on 2009-06-10 23:51:53 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.