Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Branko Cibej wrote:
>
>> HuiHuang wrote:
>>
>>> 3b) Suggested change for Subversion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think that “One Commit, One Transaction” is the best(and this is
>>> also compatible with
>>>
>>> original system). So commit files from different repositories at a
>>> time and break them into
>>>
>>> several transactions may be not a good idea. And I suggest that we
>>> should constrain
>>>
>>> committing files in the same repository.
>>>
>>>
>> But why restrict to a single repsitory? I agree that one transaction per
>> repository makes sense; however, I see no reason to not launch several
>> commit transactions within one svn_client_commit. By the way, this would
>> be an elegant solution for
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1167
>>
>
> Let's just go one step at a time, and focus on the "multiple working
> copies" issue first. Once that is solved, we can easily extend it
> to "multiple repositories".
>
I agree on the one-step-at-a-time approach, but I'm not sure about the
"easily" unless the current design at least takes the next step into
account.
-- Brane
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2356064
Received on 2009-05-28 09:46:34 CEST