Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On May 25, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 08:08:17AM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>>> On May 24, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Author: neels
>>>> Date: Sun May 24 13:55:35 2009
>>>> New Revision: 37806
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>> * subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c (drive):
>>>>
>>> Move the function name to it's own line.
>>>
>> HACKING has examples like this:
>>
>> * dialects/nightingale.c (get_base_pitch): Allow 3/4-tone
>> pitch variation to account for trait variability amongst
>> isolated populations Erithacus megarhynchos.
>>
>
> Oh, so it does.
>
> It's been a while since I've seen that format used, and we've seemed
> to standardize on the "separate line" format. Any objections to
> changing that example?
>
Yes. Check the logs, we have hundreds of messages like that. IIRC this
is even the preferred form according to GNU log message conventions,
which we liberally stole from. Makes no sense to change Hacking if that
makes tons of our logs "bad', no?
-- Brane
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2353621
Received on 2009-05-25 21:51:53 CEST