Quick summary:
- We have patented technology that provides replication for CVS,
Subversion and JIRA.
- NO changes and I mean NO changes to SVN. No hook scripts here there
or anywhere. The SVN community does a great job, so no need for us to
change.
- Quick pitch - we have some huge deployments out there that use
Subversion MultiSite running over thousands of users and many sites
with no admin overhead.
- You don't need to go with a disconnected architecture like GIT to
achieve enterprise class distribution. SVN is a fantastic product and
that is why it is the most popular SCM.
- Elaine.
On Apr 18, 7:20 am, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpil..._at_collab.net> wrote:
> webp..._at_tigris.org wrote:
> > svnsync is unidirection sync to get a read only mirror site. Will svnsync
> > develop to bidirection?
>
> > I hear a pay softwareWANdiscocan do subversion multisite. IsWANdisco
> > base on svnsync ?
>
> It's possible thatWANdiscouses svnsync for replication, but I get the
> sense from talking with their representatives that their software has a
> significant amount of extra-Subversion-al architecture -- we aren't talking
> about a couple of little hook scripts here and there.
>
> > Hope svnsync can do bidirection sync in the future :)
>
> svnsync will almost certainly never do bidirectional replication because of
> the weakness of the underlying merge algorithms. If you absolutely need
> bidirectional synchronization, you should seriously consider using a DVCS
> like git or mercurial.
>
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpil..._at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
>
> ------------------------------------------------------http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessag...
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2120982
Received on 2009-05-08 22:21:51 CEST