Hi David,
I have obviously misread it, sorry.
I was sure one of the posting read that it was for Apache 2.2 and the
other for 2.0
Anyway, I am not an SVN Committer and so (personally) cannot commit
the patch for you.
My Role as Patch Manager is to ensure that patch submissions by non-
committers don't slip through the cracks!
Thus the email to bring it back to the top of everyone's mail client
to try and get some new interest / enthusiasm for the submission.
Gavin.
On 02/05/2009, at 12:00 AM, David Darj wrote:
> Hi Gavin.
>
> The two postings contains the same patch file.
> I thought it was best to post it in a seperate thread with the [PATCH]
> prefix for clearity.
>
> Great if you could commit this patch so it'll be ready for the
> upcoming
> 1.6.2 release.
>
> Thanks
> /David
>
> Gavin Baumanis wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I was just about to do the weekly pings for patches that were
>> submitted, when I came across this one from you.
>>
>> I just wanted to know if this new patch supersedes the previous one
>> you write for apache 2.2?
>> I.e does the new patch incorporate the changes you made in the
>> previous one too - or are they separate?
>>
>> Here is a link to the original,
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsMessageId=1763363&dsForumId=462
>>
>> Gavin.
>>
>> On 25/04/2009, at 6:36 AM, David Darj wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Patch for the packages/windows-WiX installer to handle the fact that
>>> there are no binaries built for Apache 2.0 bindings<Svn-
>>> WindowsWiX-1.6.diff>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2012588
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2014988
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2022643
Received on 2009-05-02 03:08:04 CEST