[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: docstring clarification

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:40:18 +0200

On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 17:27, Edmund Wong <ed_at_kdtc.net> wrote:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>
>>>    /** If not NULL, an open working copy access baton to either the
>>>     *  path itself (if @c path is a directory), or to the parent
>>>     *  directory (if @c path is a file.)
>>
>> This doc string is complete.
>> If 'access' is NULL, then it doesn't point to anything.
>> If 'access' isn't NULL, then it points to an open working copy access baton.
>>
> Ah.  Now I understand.  'to' is being used as a verb, right?

Yes. As in "points to" or "opened to" or something like that.

Access batons are associated with directories, which is why the
docstring clarifies the baton based on the path's kind.

Cheers,
-g

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1793385
Received on 2009-04-18 19:40:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.