[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Update HACKING: Mutual respect / Evaluate the code, not the coder.

From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever.FTA_at_GMail.Com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:34:58 +0200

2009/4/15 Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 21:12, Jack Repenning <jrepenning_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> Stefan Sperling ran into a problem where the ML software munged his
>>> patch. Basically, it *rewrote* the message into something that was
>>> *incorrect*. It said "quoted-printable", but the content was wrong.
>> I'm aware of quoted-printable botches over the message *body*, including
>> bodies that stupidly get converted to attachments, but not for things that
>> start out as attachments. I've worked some of the former cases with Stefan.
>> Can you link me to an example of the latter?
> Sorry... thought I mentioned the patch was *inline* ... it was not
> munging an attachment.

The attachment was also broken.


Received on 2009-04-16 12:35:15 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.