On Apr 6, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2009-04-06 19:11:54 Hyrum K. Wright napisał(a):
>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Author: arfrever
>>> Date: Mon Apr 6 09:59:35 2009
>>> New Revision: 37026
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> On the '1.6.x' branch:
>>>
>>> * STATUS: Nominate r37009 and vote for some revisions.
>>> ...
>>> + * r37009
>>> + Recommend SQLite 3.6.12.
>>> + Votes:
>>> + +1: arfrever
>>
>> Note that even if this gets merged, it's doubtful I'll use the
>> updated
>> script when generating the deps tarball. Unless there is a critical
>> bug found in 3.6.11, I plan on pegging that version with the 1.6.x
>> branch.
>
> 2009-03-31 15:41:30 D. Richard Hipp napisał(a):
>> ...
I read the release announcement last week, no need to parrot it back
on this list.
We don't use *either* of the failure modes listed in that
announcement, in-memory databases or a shared memory cache, so neither
of these bugs affect us. Therefore, an upgrade isn't required. QED.
Also, let me repeat: the number of people which build our packages
from source is miniscule compared the to the number of people who use
a precompiled binary. And the people building those binaries control
which versions of SQLite they use, regardless of what we ship.
But this isn't worth my time or effort arguing about.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1563439
Received on 2009-04-06 19:32:32 CEST