On Mar 31, 2009, at 6:05 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2009-3-30 19:03 Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
> napisał(a):
>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> While 1.6.0 hasn't been out for a long time, there have already
>>> been a
>>> lot of bugs fixed. One in particular is bugging me a lot because I
>>> get
>>> at least 10 crash dumps a day sent in for that: r36751. Seems a
>>> lot of
>>> people are affected by that and they all can't update their working
>>> copies without a fresh checkout first.
>>>
>>> So, what's the plan/time for 1.6.1?
>>
>> I was planning on waiting another week or so (say Apr. 8-ish), but it
>> there is demand, and folks are fine with it, I'm happy to roll it
>> this
>> week sometime.
>
> I would suggest creating 1.6.1 tarball on 2009-04-10 and releasing it
> on 2009-04-12.
Out of curiosity, any particular reason why those particular dates?
I'm not totally against the idea, but many committers are AFK over the
weekends; a tarball posted for signatures on a Friday historically
hasn't garnered much attention until the following week. Without a
compelling reason to change, rolling midweek gives us a much faster
turnaround time when collecting signatures.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1495127
Received on 2009-03-31 14:15:19 CEST