[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r36822 - in trunk: subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest tools/dev

From: Branko Cibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:51:15 +0200

Greg Stein wrote:
> I disagree with the complexity that you're introducing. I have vetoed
> your two changes. You have failed to persuade me that your changes are
> an improvement, nor that you've alleviated the complexity concerns
> that I have.
> I do not see how you're ever going to persuade me that increasing the
> method count brings benefit.
> Maybe a future patch to fix the hashable thing would be workable. But
> these two revisions are not, and I stand by my reasonings and votes.

FWIW, having looked at those changes, I agree with Greg. So now you have
two vetos on your hands.

As I said earlier, I doubt very much that Python-3.0 will become a
reasonable baseline anytime soon. There are too many IMNSHO gratuitous
incompatibilities with the 2.x series.

-- Brane

Received on 2009-03-30 05:51:36 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.