Ah. Yeah, then it would be understandable. But I'm guessing the
framework is a little more solid, and this is "just another option",
and that the devs wouldn't be running/affected by that option.
I just have a fear of branch development :-)
Cheers,
-g
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 17:24, Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo_at_mobsol.be> wrote:
> With digest, ra_serf authn was broken for almost the whole duration of
> the branch. But, ok, if Kerberos doesn't require changes to the authn
> framework I'll do it on trunk.
>
> Lieven
>
> Greg Stein wrote:
>> Why start a separate branch? Why not just do this on trunk? It gets
>> more exposure/review that way.
>>
>> It isn't like this code is going to destabilize trunk.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 13:35, Lieven Govaerts <lgo_at_mobsol.be> wrote:
>>> Author: lgo
>>> Date: Sun Mar 29 05:35:47 2009
>>> New Revision: 36838
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> * branches/ra_serf-kerb: created from trunk_at_36837.
>>>
>>> Added:
>>> branches/ra_serf-kerb/ (props changed)
>>> - copied from r36837, trunk/
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=1470280
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1471697
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1472029
Received on 2009-03-29 18:27:44 CEST