Re: [patch] c99-isms

Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> You missed a case of declaration-after-assignment, but I'll fix it. Also, I
>> changed all the declarations you touched from merely:
>>
>> struct some_struct;
>>
>> to:
>>
>> struct some_struct = { 0 };
>>
>> which is consistent with the way other code in our codebase inits
>> stack-allocated structures.
>
> You should have said something earlier, I could have done that :-).

True. 'cept I didn't think of it earlier. :-)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1435068