Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 22:24, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> ...
>> +++ trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/merge.c Wed Mar 25 14:24:32 2009 (r36782)
>> @@ -287,40 +287,41 @@ end_merge(svn_ra_serf__xml_parser_t *par
>> apr_hash_get(info->props,
>> "post-commit-err", APR_HASH_KEY_STRING));
>> }
>> - else if (ctx->session->wc_callbacks->push_wc_prop)
>> + else
>> {
>> - const char *href, *checked_in;
>> - svn_string_t checked_in_str;
>> + const char *href;
>>
>> href = apr_hash_get(info->props, "href", APR_HASH_KEY_STRING);
>> - checked_in = apr_hash_get(info->props, "checked-in",
>> - APR_HASH_KEY_STRING);
>> -
>> if (! svn_path_is_ancestor(ctx->merge_url, href))
>> {
>> /* ### need something better than APR_EGENERAL */
>> return svn_error_createf(APR_EGENERAL, NULL,
>> - _("A MERGE response for '%s' is not a child "
>> - "of the destination ('%s')"),
>> + _("A MERGE response for '%s' is not "
>> + "a child of the destination ('%s')"),
>> href, ctx->merge_url);
>> }
Hi. Remember me?
>> href = svn_path_is_child(ctx->merge_url, href, NULL);
>> if (! href) /* the paths are equal */
>> href = "";
>>
>> - checked_in_str.data = checked_in;
>> - checked_in_str.len = strlen(checked_in);
>> -
>> /* We now need to dive all the way into the WC to update the
>> * base VCC url.
>> */
>> - SVN_ERR(ctx->session->wc_callbacks->push_wc_prop(
>> - ctx->session->wc_callback_baton,
>> - href,
>> - SVN_RA_SERF__WC_CHECKED_IN_URL,
>> - &checked_in_str,
>> - info->pool));
>> + if ((! SVN_RA_SERF__HAVE_HTTPV2_SUPPORT(ctx->session))
>> + && ctx->session->wc_callbacks->push_wc_prop)
>> + {
>> + svn_string_t checked_in_str;
>> + const char *checked_in;
>>
>> + checked_in = apr_hash_get(info->props, "checked-in",
>> + APR_HASH_KEY_STRING);
>> + checked_in_str.data = checked_in;
>> + checked_in_str.len = strlen(checked_in);
>> +
>> + SVN_ERR(ctx->session->wc_callbacks->push_wc_prop(
>> + ctx->session->wc_callback_baton, href,
>> + SVN_RA_SERF__WC_CHECKED_IN_URL, &checked_in_str, info->pool));
>
> href is only needed here, so you can tighten up its computation/scope.
No, I expressly wish to always hit the sanity check above, which previously
only "ran" if there was a push_wc_prop() callback function to use. We've
seen enough bugs over time in this area to make me want to always perform
the sanity check. When this error triggers, it has traditionally meant that
a commit has gone to the *wrong* FS node ... like changes intended for
/trunk winding up on some branch. Users will want to know about this
scenario, even if they aren't writing out wcprops.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1431566
Received on 2009-03-26 17:01:33 CET