Re: Enhancement suggestion...

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:22, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Another approach in 1.6 that could work is to take advantage of
>> knowing the protocol steps used. He could add and commit the
>> lesson.exe to one directory. Then use "svn copy" to make copies of it
>> to the other directories. At commit time, svn *should* tell the server
>> to simply copy the file to the other directories. It shouldn't upload
>> it again.
>
> This is the approach that I always use.  It works well for me.

Yeah... but "user strategies" are always annoying, in favor of the
tool just Doing The Right Thing.

I suspect we can have our v2 http protocol do the right operation.
Might need some FS changes, though: we'd need to copy a node, but not
leave copy information. For http v1, we'd probably just have to send
it multiple times like today.

Cheers,
-g

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1430046
Received on 2009-03-26 14:35:27 CET