heh. I had a patch to do this in my 1.6.x working copy, but was
waiting for 1.6.0 to be announced before doing anything (on the
miniscule chance that we'd have to pull the release for some reason).
Now you've gone and given me a bunch of conflicts to resolve. :)
-Hyrum
On Mar 19, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Thu Mar 19 17:42:48 2009
> New Revision: 36692
>
> Log:
> Since 1.6.0 is "out the door", roll all nominations forward to 1.6.1.
> Adjust votes that were tagged for 1.6.1 into the "regular" voting
> batch.
>
> (I did not move anything into the Approved area for clarity)
>
> * STATUS: roll candidates and votes forward to 1.6.1
>
> Modified:
> branches/1.6.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: branches/1.6.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?pathrev=36692&r1=36691&r2=36692
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> --- branches/1.6.x/STATUS Thu Mar 19 16:28:15 2009 (r36691)
> +++ branches/1.6.x/STATUS Thu Mar 19 17:42:48 2009 (r36692)
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ See "Stabilizing and maintaining release
> details on how release lines and voting work, what kinds of bugs can
> delay a release, etc.
>
> -Status of 1.6.0:
> +Status of 1.6.1:
> ================
>
> Candidate changes:
> @@ -19,28 +19,25 @@ Candidate changes:
> Fix warning in Python 2.6 for ctypes-python bindings
> Votes:
> +1: djames, arfrever
> - +1: gstein (for 1.6.1; this can wait)
> + +1: gstein
>
> * r36093, r36292, r36406
> Improve some messages.
> Votes:
> +1: arfrever
> - +1: gstein, rhuijben (for 1.6.1; this can wait)
> + +1: gstein, rhuijben
>
> * r36209
> Update paths to svnmucc.
> Votes:
> +1: arfrever
> - +1: gstein, rhuijben (for 1.6.1; this can wait)
> + +1: gstein, rhuijben
>
> * r36388
> Recommend Neon 0.28.4.
> Votes:
> +1: arfrever, steveking (already using neon 0.28.4 in TSVN)
> - +1: gstein, rhuijben (for 1.6.1; this can wait)
> -
> -
> -Candidate if a new tarball is constructed (otherwise for 1.6.1):
> + +1: gstein, rhuijben
>
> * r36049-r36051, r36131
> Resolve the SVN_ERR_MALFUNCTION() reproducible on Windows with
> @@ -52,8 +49,7 @@ Candidate if a new tarball is constructe
> delays the Windows automated testrun until a user confirms.
> (This doesn't fix this testcase; it just handles this part of
> the problem)
> Votes:
> - +1: rhuijben, pburba, steveking
> - +1: gstein (for a new CODE tarball, not a doc tarball)
> + +1: rhuijben, pburba, steveking, gstein
>
> * r36159
> Fix proxying of LOCK and UNLOCK requests via WebDAV proxies.
> @@ -61,8 +57,7 @@ Candidate if a new tarball is constructe
> With the fix, each slave server tries to field the lock/unlock,
> resulting
> in competing ideas of what is and isn't locked.
> Votes:
> - +1: cmpilato, rhuijben, arfrever
> - +1: gstein (for 1.6.1)
> + +1: cmpilato, rhuijben, arfrever, gstein
>
> * r36238
> Fix build of RHEL5 RPM packages.
> @@ -71,17 +66,14 @@ Candidate if a new tarball is constructe
> 1.6.0 but would be nice if the train is still in the station.
> Otherwise
> please feel free to move to 1.6.1.
> Votes:
> - +1: dws, arfrever
> - +0: gstein (for 1.6.0)
> - +1: gstein (for 1.6.1)
> + +1: dws, arfrever, gstein
>
> * r36252-36253 (on branch 1.6.x-r36252)
> Fix valgrind UMRs.
> Justification:
> UMRs are undefined behaviour
> Votes:
> - +1: philip, rhuijben, stsp, arfrever
> - +1: gstein (for a new CODE tarball, not a doc tarball)
> + +1: philip, rhuijben, stsp, arfrever, gstein
>
> * r36302
> Fix a small problem in the loggy upgrade process. Some v10
> working copies
> @@ -95,10 +87,7 @@ Candidate if a new tarball is constructe
> Since the presence of that file has been deprecated for ages,
> let's just apply this easy fix to 1.6 instead of tweaking the
> script.
> Votes:
> - +1: rhuijben, stsp, arfrever
> - -0: gstein (for 1.6.0 since it isn't "needed" except for when
> somebody
> - uses a script which I conceptually disagree with)
> - +1: gstein (for 1.6.1)
> + +1: rhuijben, stsp, arfrever, gstein
>
> * r36213
> Trivial help output fix.
> @@ -108,8 +97,7 @@ Candidate if a new tarball is constructe
> Already merged to 1.6.x by Arfrever in r36214, but reverted
> in 36322 because it was not formally voted on.
> Votes:
> - +1: stsp, arfrever
> - +1: gstein (for 1.6.1; it can wait)
> + +1: stsp, arfrever, gstein
>
> * r36613, r36615, r36631, r36641
> Avoid potential segfault when dealing with subtree mergeinfo.
> @@ -128,11 +116,6 @@ Candidate if a new tarball is constructe
> Votes:
> +1: pburba
>
> -Status of 1.6.1:
> -================
> -
> -Candidate changes:
> -
> * r36178
> External merge-tool improvements.
> Justification:
> @@ -229,7 +212,7 @@ Candidate changes:
> Notes:
> r36686 is the fix and r36689 adds a regression test.
> Votes:
> - +1: rhuijben
> + +1: rhuijben, gstein
>
>
> Approved changes:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=1359449
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1360500
Received on 2009-03-20 03:51:20 CET