This revision does not go into CHANGES because it was just fixing a
1.6 regression. There is no behavior change in relationship to
previous release.
The reference to the other issues was just saying "even though there
are still issues with UNC paths (those issues), we should still fix
this regression of behavior that DID work".
Mark
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarbaise_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on the 1.6 branch i've found in the above revision some information
> about the issues #2028 and #2556....
>
> But the #2028 is not closed which is targeted to 2.0.0 milstone...
>
> and the information in the revisions is the following:
>
> * ^/branches/1.6.x-UNC-paths
> Resolves the regression on 1.6.X that disabled UNC path support on
> Windows.
> (All \\server\share format paths were canonicalized to /local/dir
> format).
> Justification:
> A lot of Windows users use UNC paths in corporate environment. While
> not fully supported until issue #2028 and #2556 are resolved, this
> is a
> serious regression against older versions.
> Notes:
> ....
>
>
> So what does this mean ? I've got the impression this change is not
> ready yet ?
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
> --
> SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung Schulung Tel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
> Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz Marbaise ICQ#: 135949029
> Hauptstrasse 177 USt.IdNr: DE191347579
> 52146 Würselen http://www.soebes.de
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1334791
>
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1334858
Received on 2009-03-16 19:48:43 CET