[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

CHANGEs File for Subversion 1.6 - Questions - #3349

From: Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarbaise_at_gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:38:02 +0100


I found the following:

In theory, BDB backend could allow `changes' table out-of-sync with
actual changes (#3349)

A comment in the #3349 issue:
NOTE: The API usage demonstrated in the regression test is not valid
per the instructions on the APIs given in svn_fs.h, which say that you
must send windows including the NULL terminating window through the
returned handlers before making other changes to the transaction. FSFS
seems to enforce this, but BDB does not. In BDB, this code path will
result in node revisions that still have dangling
representations-in-progress, but that was true before my changes, too.

Based on the diff
   svn diff -r 34896:34897 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn
i don't see a real change in an API ?

Or did i misunderstand a thing ?

Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise

SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung Schulung    Tel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz Marbaise        ICQ#: 135949029
Hauptstrasse 177                         USt.IdNr: DE191347579
52146 W├╝rselen                           http://www.soebes.de
Received on 2009-03-16 18:38:23 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.