On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 17:44, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> <Arfrever.FTA_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009-03-16 17:34 Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> napisał(a):
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Mon Mar 16 09:34:11 2009
>>> New Revision: 36602
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Using my prerogative as release manager to add an explanitory note
>>> as a result
>>> of the merge in r36589.
>>>
>>> * subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h:
>>> Explain why we skipped an error code.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> branches/1.6.x/subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h
>>>
>>> Modified: branches/1.6.x/subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h
>>> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/branches/1.6.x/subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h?pathrev=36602&r1=36601&r2=36602
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> ====================================================================
>>> --- branches/1.6.x/subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h Mon Mar 16
>>> 09:26:18 2009 (r36601)
>>> +++ branches/1.6.x/subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h Mon Mar 16
>>> 09:34:11 2009 (r36602)
>>> @@ -842,6 +842,8 @@ SVN_ERROR_START
>>> SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_CATEGORY_START + 11,
>>> "Repository has been moved")
>>>
>>> + /* SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_CATEGORY_START + 12 is reserved for use in
>>> 1.7. */
>>> +
>>> /** @since New in 1.6 */
>>> SVN_ERRDEF(SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_FORBIDDEN,
>>> SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_CATEGORY_START + 13,
>>
>> I suggest to swap SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_CONN_TIMEOUT and
>> SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_FORBIDDEN on trunk and fix definition of
>> SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_FORBIDDEN on the 1.6.x branch.
>> It would be obvious fix, but I preventively vote +1 for the
>> suggestion
>> described above.
>
> I see no reason to do this. It is perfectly fine for 1.6 to have
> non-contiguous error codes.
>
> Look at SVN_ERR_ENTRY_CATEGORY + 1 ... that has been empty for years.
> We have plenty of deprecated slots.
>
> There is no need for churn here.
+1
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1334384
Received on 2009-03-16 18:15:39 CET