[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Add separate error code for RA Forbidden

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_finemaltcoding.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:28:32 -0700

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer_at_samba.org> wrote:
...
>> So the question becomes, do we want to leak this distinction from RFC
>> 2616 into SVN_ERR_RA's or SVN_ERR_RA_DAV's error codes? The latter
>> seems reasonable, but if we're going to put it there, perhaps it
>> should be in the top-level.
>
> What do you mean by top-level here exactly?

SVN_ERR_RA_FORBIDDEN

> Putting it in SVN_ERR_RA or SVN_ERR_RA_DAV both seems reasonable to me.
> I would think it's not very likely that svn_ra_file or svn_ra_svn would
> return this error, so perhaps that is a good reason to put it in
> SVN_ERR_RA_DAV.

Why would mod_dav_svn return this error, but svn or svnserve would
not? Just for spec conformance? Just playing devil's advocate here.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1314607
Received on 2009-03-12 23:28:46 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.