[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Redesign of functional specification for obliterate (Reposting extended patch)

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:00:51 -0500

On Mar 4, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 06:27:57PM -0500, Magnus Torfason wrote:
>> What would be the process for getting this kind of
>> patch committed into the repo? Votes, comments, consensus?
>
> There is no formal process as such.
>
> Your earlier posts about obliterate have received lots of comments,
> so it's reasonable to assume that this patch will trigger some further
> discussion.
>
> I'd say we'll wait a while for some comments, and if the general vibe
> during the discussion is positive, we'll commit this update to the
> spec.
> If no comments arrive, we'll see what we can do about that.
>
> While I myself have not yet concerned myself enough with "obliterate"
> to be able to provide useful comments, I am glad to see you trying
> to push this long-standing issue forward and would hate to see this
> contribution end up being dropped.

I went ahead and committed the patch in r36503. Although I didn't
read it thoroughly, and I don't have time to push the obliterate work
forward, I think we can iterate on the design in the repo instead of
the mailing list. Getting this committed is a step toward that end.

-Hyrum

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1313001
Received on 2009-03-12 15:01:14 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.