[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r36401 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 03:01:16 +0100

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 02:15, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2009, at 5:56 PM, Branko Cibej wrote:
>
>> Greg Stein wrote:
>>> Oh yeah...
>>>
>>> Summary of test results:
>>>  1037 tests PASSED
>>>  24 tests SKIPPED
>>>  24 tests XFAILED
>>>  64 tests FAILED
>>>  2 tests XPASSED
>>>
>>
>> Out of interest, are the two XPASSes a genuine fix of currently broken
>> behaviour, or are they just a fluke?
>
> I suspect these tests test a failure condition that isn't yet
> implemented (that is, they expect a failure to pass, but because there
> is no failure detected, they fail, and are marked as XFAIL).  My guess
> is that wc-ng currently causes failures in these scenarios, though not
> for the intended reason.  That leads to the XPASS.

Huh?

Too many unreferenced pronouns and double negatives.

In short: no, we've done nothing to fix broken behavior. We're trying
to precisely mirror the prior behavior of the various wc_entry related
functionality.

Cheers,
-g

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1286384
Received on 2009-03-08 03:01:30 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.