On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 13:34, Bert Huijben <rhuijben_at_sharpsvn.net> wrote:
>...
> @@ -932,6 +933,15 @@ test_dirent_is_canonical(const char **ms
> tests[i].path,
> canonical ? "TRUE" : "FALSE",
> tests[i].canonical ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
> +
> + canonicalized = svn_dirent_canonicalize(tests[i].path, pool);
> +
> + if (canonical && (strcmp(tests[i].path, canonicalized) != 0))
> + return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_TEST_FAILED, NULL,
>...
> @@ -1035,6 +1049,16 @@ test_uri_is_canonical(const char **msg,
> tests[i].path,
> canonical ? "TRUE" : "FALSE",
> tests[i].canonical ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
> +
> + canonicalized = svn_uri_canonicalize(tests[i].path, pool);
> +
> + if (canonical != (strcmp(tests[i].path, canonicalized) == 0))
> + return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_TEST_FAILED, NULL,
Why are these two checks different?
Cheers,
-g
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1282703
Received on 2009-03-07 14:15:44 CET