Oop. There are a number of regressions with this change, including in
basic_tests. I'll get 'em fixed up shortly.
Three steps forward... two steps back...
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 15:28, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Wed Mar  4 06:28:05 2009
> New Revision: 36307
>
> Log:
> Refine the SCHEDULE field of returned entries, and make sure that DELETED
> nodes are recorded properly.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c:
> Â (read_entries): for added nodes, it might be a simple add (rather than
> Â Â replace) when there isn't a node in the current BASE tree (ie. the
> Â Â database records it as "not present at this revision"). if we're
> Â Â attempting to reading all the entries for a directory, and that
> Â Â directory is obstructed/missing, then the dir itself should be listed
> Â Â as schedule "normal" (the real state is in the parent). lastly, any
> Â Â entry marked DELETED should be in the "normal" state since we aren't
> Â Â actually going to try and delete anything.
> Â (write_entry): a node that is marked DELETED should get a row in the
> Â Â BASE_NODE table to record its not-present status.
>
> Modified:
> Â trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c
>
> Modified: trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c?pathrev=36307&r1=36306&r2=36307
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c     Wed Mar  4 05:07:13 2009     (r36306)
> +++ trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c     Wed Mar  4 06:28:05 2009     (r36307)
> @@ -1030,20 +1030,37 @@ read_entries(svn_wc_adm_access_t *adm_ac
>
> Â Â Â Â Â if (base_shadowed)
> Â Â Â Â Â Â {
> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â entry->schedule = svn_wc_schedule_replace;
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â svn_wc__db_status_t base_status;
>
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â /* ### mystery: make the rev same as BASE. */
> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_base_get_info(NULL, NULL,
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_base_get_info(&base_status, NULL,
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â &entry->revision,
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â NULL, NULL, NULL,
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â NULL, NULL, NULL,
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â db, entry_abspath,
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â iterpool, iterpool));
> +
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (base_status == svn_wc__db_status_not_present)
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â {
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â /* ### the underlying node is DELETED in this revision. Â */
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â entry->deleted = TRUE;
> +
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â /* This is an add since there isn't a node to replace. Â */
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â entry->schedule = svn_wc_schedule_add;
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â }
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â else
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â entry->schedule = svn_wc_schedule_replace;
> Â Â Â Â Â Â }
> Â Â Â Â Â else
> Â Â Â Â Â Â {
> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â entry->schedule = svn_wc_schedule_add;
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â /* ### when we're reading a directory that is not present,
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ### then it must be "normal" rather than "add". Â */
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (*entry->name == '\0'
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â && status == svn_wc__db_status_obstructed_add)
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â entry->schedule = svn_wc_schedule_normal;
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â else
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â entry->schedule = svn_wc_schedule_add;
>
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â /* ### if this looks like a plain old add, then rev=0. Â */
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (!SVN_IS_VALID_REVNUM(entry->copyfrom_rev)
> @@ -1087,7 +1104,10 @@ read_entries(svn_wc_adm_access_t *adm_ac
> Â Â Â Â }
> Â Â Â else if (status == svn_wc__db_status_not_present)
> Â Â Â Â {
> - Â Â Â Â Â entry->schedule = svn_wc_schedule_delete;
> + Â Â Â Â Â /* ### buh. 'deleted' nodes are actually supposed to be
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â ### schedule "normal" since we aren't going to actually *do*
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â ### anything to this node at commit time. Â */
> + Â Â Â Â Â entry->schedule = svn_wc_schedule_normal;
> Â Â Â Â Â entry->deleted = TRUE;
> Â Â Â Â }
> Â Â Â else if (status == svn_wc__db_status_obstructed)
> @@ -1572,6 +1592,13 @@ write_entry(svn_sqlite__db_t *wc_db,
> Â Â Â Â break;
> Â Â }
>
> + Â /* Something deleted in this revision means there should always be a
> + Â Â BASE node to indicate the not-present node. Â */
> + Â if (entry->deleted)
> + Â Â {
> + Â Â Â base_node = MAYBE_ALLOC(base_node, scratch_pool);
> + Â Â }
> +
> Â if (entry->copied)
> Â Â {
> Â Â Â /* Make sure we get a WORKING_NODE inserted. The copyfrom information
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=1266997
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1267170
Received on 2009-03-04 16:05:20 CET