Re: [PATCH] Redesign of functional specification for obliterate (Reposting extended patch)

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 06:27:57PM -0500, Magnus Torfason wrote:
> I'm posting an updated patch to the svn obliterate functional
> specification. The patch is getting a bit big (670 lines), and
> it is only going to grow bigger as I continue working on this,
> so it seems proper that it gets some review before I go much
> further. What would be the process for getting this kind of
> patch committed into the repo? Votes, comments, consensus?

Just a low-priority drive-by remark:

The text uses the '+' character for bullet lists, which makes
a unidiff of the text a bit confusing to read.

Could we switch the text to use some other character (like '*')
instead, in a separate patch?

Thanks,
Stefan
Received on 2009-03-04 12:04:26 CET