On Sunday 01 March 2009 18:33:48 Mark Phippard wrote:
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux opti 2.6.24-23-generic #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 00:13:11 UTC 2009 i686
> > GNU/Linux $ svn --version
> > svn, version 1.4.6 (r28521)
>
> Since you are calling this a 1.6 regression, why are you not comparing
> against 1.5.6?
Sorry! My bad; I wanted the post out quickly and had no
1.5 on my machine.
1.5.6 numbers:
$ time ./svn merge -r 15456:15455
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/svn/tortoisesvn/trunk ~/TSVN3
--- Reverse-merging r15456 into
'/home/stefan/TSVN3/src/TortoiseProc/RevisionGraph/RevisionGraphDlg.cpp':
U /home/stefan/TSVN3/src/TortoiseProc/RevisionGraph/RevisionGraphDlg.cpp
--- Reverse-merging r15456 into
'/home/stefan/TSVN3/src/TortoiseProc/RevisionGraph/RevisionGraphDlg.h':
U /home/stefan/TSVN3/src/TortoiseProc/RevisionGraph/RevisionGraphDlg.h
real 6m52.263s
user 0m2.220s
sys 0m0.564s
So, this is basically the same as for 1.6.
Obviously, I never needed to undo revisions
for quite a long time.
> > <snip>
> > $ svn co http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/svn/tortoisesvn/trunk -r15533
> > ~/TSVN > /dev/null
>
> You might have mentioned how long it takes this checkout to run? I am
> running checkout from a box in the CollabNet network and it is still
> taking forever.
Hm. Around 4 minutes here, including externals.
I didn't want to clutter my post with numbers
that I didn't consider relevant for merge performance.
-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2009-03-01 20:50:36 CET