Re: Bump SWIG requirements from 1.3.31
2009-03-01 01:13:20 anatoly techtonik napisał(a):
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> <arfrever.fta_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> A lot of releases happened in SWIG world http://www.swig.org/ since
> >> last update of ./subversion/swig/INSTALL that lists 1.3.31 version as
> >> latest recommended. Are there any good reasons to stick to 1.3.31 when
> >> there is a queue of bugfixes up to 1.3.38 ?
> > Python bindings generated by SWIG 1.3.38 don't work with Python 2.6.
> That's bug definitely. In SWIG or in binding definition. I bet SWIG
> 1.3.31 won't work either, because 1.3.31 was released on 2006/11/20
> while Python 2.6 appeared two years later on 01-Oct-2008
> Even if bindings are in fact generated - I doubt they are optimized
> for Python 2.6 or will work correctly.
All tests of Python bindings pass with Python 2.6 when these bindings have been
generated by SWIG 1.3.36.
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Received on 2009-03-01 01:18:17 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev