[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Comment on obliterate functional specification

From: Magnus ... <zulutime.net_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:20:26 -0500

No, I don't believe this has been archived anywhere
outside the dev list. But not to worry, I'm still on
the case. I submitted this text as a patch to the
functional specification. See:
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1135837

And I will make sure that any insights from this discussion
get either committed or explicitly rejected before my
involvement ends.

In fact, I have two more installments ready in this little
obliteration series, but I've been hesitant to compete for
bandwidth with the effort to get 1.6 out the door. I'll
probably post them in the near future and repost the patch
I submitted as well.

Best,
Magnus

Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> Have we archived this somewhere? On issue #516, or in the notes/
> directory, etc.?
>
> Daniel
>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> DEFINITION OF THE OBLITERATION OPERATION
>>
>> ...
>>
>>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1205597
Received on 2009-02-22 00:00:03 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.