On Feb 19, 2009, at 3:52 PM, kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com wrote:
>
> "Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote on 02/19/2009
> 01:09:23 PM:
>
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > After a flurry of activity to fix a couple of problems discovered in
> > rc1, I'm pleased to announce that Subversion 1.6.0-rc2 "Swordfish"
> is
> > up for testing and signing. The magic revision is r36015.
> >
> > http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.0-rc2/
>
> My vote doesn't count, but "make check" passes with no failures
> on Solaris 10 x86 built "mostly static" with the following
> built static library deps:
>
> ZLIB_VER := 1.2.3
> OPENSSL_VER := 0.9.7m
> OPENLDAP_VER := 2.4.10
> SQLITE_VER := 3.6.11
> APR_VER := 1.2.12
> APRUTIL_VER := 1.2.12
> NEON_VER := 0.28.3
> SERF_VER := 0.3.0
> SWIG_VER := 1.3.31
>
> Summary of test results:
> 24 tests SKIPPED
> 26 tests XFAILED
> (It'd be nice to summarize the number passed too, wouldn't it?)
>
> How do most people do their combinational checks?
> I.E. serf/neon/fsfs/bdb, etc.? (I'm assuming
> "make check" isn't enough and I'd like to be
> thorough on this "unique" platform...)
See http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/tools/dist/test.sh for an
example.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1194693
Received on 2009-02-19 22:57:11 CET