Re: Status of outstanding branches

Hyrum Wright wrote:
> * bdb-fixes/
> No work for three years.

This work appears to have already been merged into the trunk, if I'm reading
the commit logs correctly.

> * fs-atomic-renames/
> No work for years.

I think I can speak for myself and Garrett when I say, "Kill it."

> * fs-successor-ids/
> No work over the past year.

I'm still churning on this one -- please leave it in place.

> * http-protocol-v2/
> Active branch being worked on by C-Mike and Ben. Anticipated
> merge to trunk in the next few days?

Yup.

> * issue-2699-dev/
> Created 2 years ago by C-Mike, with some work done by Dan Rall.
> Purpose: "for adding support for all-or-nothing multi-path locks."

Please keep this around.

> * youngest-common-ancestor/
> Over 1 year old, managed by C-Mike.

And please keep this around, too.

(I routinely re-evaluate the branches I sorta kinda own, and try to delete
my own dead branches.)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1179378