[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: thoughts?

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:04:39 +0100

[cc'ing list; dev: just a short email to hyrum, but wanted to expand
audience now]

It "shouldn't" ... cachable_props is only ever set to
SVN_WC__CACHABLE_PROPS, and nobody ever attempts to change it.
Further, in props.c::build_present_props(), it doesn't even *look* at
cachable_props, but uses the constant instead. If somebody *did*
happen to change the value, then it wouldn't matter in the least.

But let's say I introduced a bug... how the heck would I test the
propcaching performance?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 18:16, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Looks okay. How does it affect propcaching performance?
>
> On Feb 13, 2009, at 2:11 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> http://paste.lisp.org/display/75405
>
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1154635
Received on 2009-02-14 03:04:53 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.