On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:20:28PM +0100, Johannes Wienke wrote:
>> Am 13.02.2009 13:06 schrieb Stefan Sperling:
>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:12:14PM +0100, Johannes Wienke wrote:
>>>> Am 12.02.2009 18:10 schrieb Hyrum K. Wright:
>>>>> Thanks. Do you have a copy of Subversion with debugging symbols so we
>>>>> can determine where in those functions it is failing?
>>>> Does this help?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> As I suspected, the binary is most likely not running with the
>>> APR version it was linked against. Please check your setup.
>>>
>>> Note that APR 0.x and APR 1.x are not binary compatible.
>>> See Subversion's INSTALL file for details.
>>
>> Ok, but I did not build svn on my own. To report this bug to the Ubuntu
>> developers it would be helpful to know if something is wrong wth the
>> combination of these packages:
>> libapr1 1.2.12
>> libsvn1 1.5.1
>> subversion 1.5.1
>
> I've checked the apr_finfo_t definitions for APR 0.x and APR 1.x,
> and they don't differ. So it may be something other than a binary
> compatibility issue.
>
> A binary incompatibility would explain your problem though.
Did you check the size of the structure members?
APR-0 may be binary incompatible with itself if one instance were
compiled with LFS support, while the other isn't...
So it may still be the issue of binary incompatability.
Bye,
Erik.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1150809
Received on 2009-02-13 14:31:02 CET