[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r35769 - branches/http-protocol-v2

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:10:48 -0600

Yes, pipelined PUTs are out of scope; see the design doc... that's
'phase 2' or somesuch. It's also likely to break FSFS and FS_BT. :-)

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:34 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:43, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> +++ branches/http-protocol-v2/BRANCH-README Mon Feb 9 11:43:33 2009 (r35769)
>>> @@ -82,8 +82,10 @@ TODO:
>>> methods as described in the design doc.
>>>
>>> - Use POST to 'me' resource to get txn name [DONE]
>>> - - Send write requests against txn and txn root URLs [STARTED]
>>> + - Set revprops using PROPPATCH on the txn resource [DONE]
>>> - Abort edit with DELETE against the txn resource [DONE]
>>> + - Send write requests against txn and txn root URLs [STARTED]
>>> + - Enable pipelined PUTs
>>
>> Eh? I thought pipelined PUTs were *specifically* out of scope for this
>> iteration.
>
> I wasn't aware of that. But then, to be honest, I wasn't planning to
> actually attack that problem anyway. Was just tracking overall TODO
> information gleaned from the design doc.
>
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1132511

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1134518
Received on 2009-02-10 16:12:06 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.