[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Help on 1.6-blocker #3334 - tree conflicts in update

From: Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:46:08 -0500

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
>>> Good to see, but geez why are you sending a patch? You are already
>>> working on a branch just commit it and point people at the commit.
>>> I still think this should all get on trunk -- today. There is no need
>>> for this to be on a branch at this point and if it was on trunk there
>>> are more of us that could test it and work with it. As an example, we
>>> have a Subclipse developer working on the graphical resolutions and
>>> running tree conflict scenarios regularly. He could use this fix now
>>> and start working on it and give feedback on bugs if he hits them.
>>> That is where the three example scripts I have originated (they all
>>> work now with this patch).
>> +1 to moving this to trunk, especially if all the tests are passing.
> Your both right, I'll commit it to the branch then we'll take it from there.

Done r35791


Received on 2009-02-10 15:46:24 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.