On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 23:51, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
>>...
>> +++ branches/http-protocol-v2/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c Fri Jan 30 14:51:09 2009 (r35605)
>> @@ -3953,6 +3953,34 @@ dav_svn__create_version_resource(dav_res
>> }
>>
>>
>> +/* POST handler for commits over HTTP protocol v2.
>> +*/
>> +int dav_svn__method_post(request_rec *r)
>> +{
>> + dav_resource *resource;
>> + dav_error *derr;
>> +
>> + derr = get_resource(r, dav_svn__get_root_dir(r),
>> + "ignored", 0, &resource);
>> + if (derr != NULL)
>> + return derr->status;
>> +
>> + if (resource->info->restype != DAV_SVN_RESTYPE_ME)
>> + return HTTP_BAD_REQUEST;
>> +
>> + /* ### Create a new txn based on HEAD. Remember the UUID. */
>> +
>> + /* ### Build a 200 CREATED response with two special headers in it:
>> +
>> + !svn/txn/UUID
>> + !svn/txp/UUID
>> + */
>
> Eh? You don't want the (repository) UUID in there. That is implied by
> the URL leading to *this* repository. You mean the "transaction ID".
>
Yes, that's what I meant too. In my own mind, I've overloaded the
phrase "uuid" to mean both repository uuid and newly-created txn id.
They both call the same apr_uuid() function, after all. :-)
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1078689
Received on 2009-01-31 07:54:57 CET