On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 23:20, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> For efficiency reasons, the system has converted the large body of this message into an attachment.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: hwright_at_tigris.org
> To: svn_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:20:25 -0800
> Subject: svn commit: r35440 - branches/explore-wc/subversion/libsvn_wc
> Author: hwright
> Date: Fri Jan 23 14:20:24 2009
> New Revision: 35440
>
> Log:
> Exile non-wc-ng entries reading code to another file, so we can pare down
> entries.c at our leisure.
>
> This duplicates a bunch of code, but lets the new file stand on its own.
> After completely migrating entries.c, we can determine which bits are still
> duplicated and refactor then.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/old-and-busted.c:
> New.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c
> (entries_accumulator, handle_start_tag, parse_entries_xml, read_entries_xml,
> write_entry_xml, write_entries_xml): Remove.
> (svn_wc__entries_write): Don't worry about writing xml entries.
>
> Added:
> branches/explore-wc/subversion/libsvn_wc/old-and-busted.c (contents, props changed)
> Modified:
> branches/explore-wc/subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c
Why is there still reading code in entries.c? I don't understand why
you don't just call read_entries_old() ?
Cheers,
-g
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1046462
Received on 2009-01-24 10:33:49 CET