[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] calling diff_summarize from SVN Perl bindings

From: James Fang <june.fang_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:55:58 +0800

Hi Julian,
    Thank you very much. My working Linux box is isolated from internet, it
saves much trouble for me.
    I got a stupid question, how do you manage to include the [[ log message
]] inline with the patch?
I guess it's not via "cat", is it ? ;)
    I can understand the importance for strict process standard, and i am
sorry for not reading the process
carefully enough and hope you can forgive me since it's my first patch.

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>wrote:

> Julian Foad wrote:
> > I have checked that the patch builds against current trunk, but I don't
> > understand SWIG so need someone else to review/test/commit it.
> >
> > I have attached the latest version of the patch (with the POD fix, from
> > from Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:08:59 +0800) as a diff against trunk_at_35343,
> > with the log message included (tweaked just a little).
>
> Wrong patch attached. Trying again...
>
>

-- 
James Fang
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1041149
Received on 2009-01-21 14:44:57 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.