Re: svn commit: r35262 - trunk/build/ac-macros

> Still working on it. I am not able to reproduce locally but based on
> the failures, I see the problem. Now...do we handle this gracefully
> like we do with zlib, putting the -L$serf_prefix/lib in LDFLAGS, or do
> we go back to the way it was? If I don't have a solid fix soon, I'll
> rollback.

By the way, the above approach does work. Is it right? I'll let you
guys decide and we'll go from there. Attached, and pasted below, is
the patch. Like I mentioned before, this is the way we handle zlib.

-- 
Take care,
Jeremy Whitlock
http://www.thoughtspark.org
Index: build/ac-macros/serf.m4
===================================================================
--- build/ac-macros/serf.m4	(revision 35270)
+++ build/ac-macros/serf.m4	(working copy)
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
     SVN_SERF_INCLUDES="-I$serf_prefix/include/serf-0"
     SVN_SERF_LIBS="-lserf-0"
     SVN_SERF_EXPORT_LIBS="-L$serf_prefix/lib -lserf-0"
+    LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L$serf_prefix/lib"
   elif test $serf_found = "reconfig"; then
     serf_found=yes
   fi